Tuesday, January 9, 2007

If the Sun Refused to Shine, I don't mind, I don't mind

Seattle was about as cool as a city can be when it's 40 degrees, rainy, and frequently gusty for an entire weekend. On the good side, the city can be easily walked from the North Side:
IMG_0445.jpg
to the South:
IMG_0438.jpg

I have to say, I was surprisingly impressed by the Pike Place Market (it's the one where they throw the fish). Besides the aerial albacore, it's actually a cool place to wander around, kind of like a year round version of the farmer's markets/crafts fairs around here, only with better, substantially larger produce. One thing about the midwest that no one realizes: the produce stinks. Back in Rochester, Wegmans Grocery Stores have seven good varieties, in at least three colors, of every type of fruit or vegetable that sits in the produce section here looking a bit past its prime. Let's put it this way, every square mile surrounding us as far as the eye can see (it's flat here, you can see for miles) grows corn, and we still have to import the edible kind from Colorado.

IMG_0418.jpg
Anyway, the Pike Place Market has a number of breakfast options, ranging from the Ubiquitous Coffeeshop that dare not speak it's name, to a really nice Russian bakery named Piroshky, Piroshky that will ship you pastries by mail.

I missed the funky new library, as well as the aquarium and the boat tour of Elliott Bay (my wife was able to take some pictures), but did get to see the newest and most Microsofty museum ever constructed, the Frank Gehry-designed Experience Music Project and associated Science Fiction Museum and Hall of Fame (it's the blue thing on the left).

IMG_0447.jpg

On the good side, the museum has a really thorough Jimi Hendrix exhibit, and an exhibit of guitars through the past century that will take your breath away. Honestly, seeing them all together will really impress on you just how aesthetically pleasing a Strat, Les Paul, or even National Steel can be (nothing can make a Flying V aesthetically pleasing, however). For those with some musical talent (a group that sadly doesn't include me), the interactive jam room must be heaven. We were a little too embarassed to keep plucking away on a bass trying to figure out at which fret we should place our fingers while some guy in the next booth over was totally shredding a guitar, but he was certainly having a great time. The only negative was the constant need to make every exhibit vastly too interactive, full of useless computers with impossible-to-navigate menus that really had nothing to do with music anyway (it will come as no shock whatsoever that Paul Allen funded the thing). Just next door, the Science Fiction museum has got to be his personal baby; the museum has the stamp of a single, eclectic, very rich, somewhat demented souveneir collector. It's got a great collection of sci-fi movie mementos, e.g., Captain Kirk's chair, along with a seemingly random collection of American pulp sci-fi novels from the 60's to the 80's. It does a good job elucidating some of the general themes of sci-fi (especially the ways in which it challenges societal notions of race and gender through an exaggerated version of "the other"), but comes up a little short in describing the full breadth of the field (almost no non-English books or movies; the picture of Solaris has George Clooney in it and you can just forget about any of Lem's other work). Even the bookshop could use a few more books (like anything by Asminov, Clarke, Heinlein, etc.), but still, it is by far the best museum I've ever seen devoted to a fictional genre.

Next time I'm in town, I'll have to check out the Museum of Flight (to see if it compares to the Air and Space in Washington and their amazing Udvar-Hazy Center, which just blew me away), and maybe even make the trip to Mount St. Helens if I go in summer and the road are open (I've been staring at the volcanocam for long enough, certainly). Still, Seattle is a fun place to visit, and the vacation was well-caffeinated. More later on the Symposium I went to, and some of the cool new trends in Physics education.

5 comments:

alexis said...

I love Seattle! Now that I live in Amsterdam, I am surprised at the similarities between the two: both are close to good fish (Seattle more so!), are bike-friendly, and suffer from constant gray and rain.

jfaberuiuc said...

They are both really compact, too. I suppose the biggest difference may be the terrain. You can see the foothills of the mountains in a couple of the photos, but had it ever cleared up (they say it does, but I have doubts), I guess that Mount Rainier is supposed to look as if it sits just outside the city (it's 54 miles away). I have to imagine that kind of view is hard to find in a country that sits mostly below sea level.

Tom Hilton said...

Nice pictures, great report. Seattle is one of two places I could conceive of living (Portland is the other) if I couldn't live here in San Francisco. I have been lucky enough to be there on a clear day, and yes, Rainier just looms over it all...plus there's Mount Baker to the northeast, and the Olympics to the west. Simply stunning.

The Science Fiction Museum is a geek's paradise (your criticism is dead-on, but there's still an amazing collection).

jfaberuiuc said...

Personally, I'm more of an East Coaster, but that may very well be my history rather than a fair statement of my preferences (I grew up in upstate NY). I'll say this, though, the mountains out west just take your breath away, in a way the Berkshires don't. The latter can be very, very pretty, but they don't inspire the same kind of awe.

I'm curious to see how the sci-fi museum evolves. If they can find some room within their interesting architectural confines, there are a lot of amazing things they could do there. Even my wife, who has read some sci-fi but doesn't really qualify as a geek in the way I would, was more than pleasantly surprised by the museum.

alexis said...

indeed, when 6 stories qualifies for a sky scraper, you're not getting fantastic views of anything here in the Netherlands.

 

Website and photos, unless otherwise indicated: Copyright 2006-7, by the authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

This website, and all contents, are licensed under the “creative commons attribution, non-commercial, share alike” license. This means, essentially, that you may copy and modify any of these materials for your own use, or for educational purposes. You can freely copy them and distribute them to others. The only rules are that you must attribute the work to the original authors, use them in a non-commercial way, and pass along these rights to everyone else.

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors, not anyone nor anything else. Word.