Sunday, December 17, 2006

Stupidity, democracy, and blogging

Although I could really care less about the honor bestowed on me by Time magazine, comrade Faber raises some important points in his screed below. Specifically, are people truly stupid, and if so, do they like it that way?

Socrates used this as his main argument against democratic governance, and similar complaints have been made about the wisdom of wikipedia and the banality of blogs. Despite the nay-sayers, I think overall stupid people manage to govern themselves somewhat reasonably and even create content which is at least amusing, and in certain ways improves on the traditional derided MSM, mostly by cannibalizing the information, and regurgitating it with added digestive juices of opinion. And we all eat it up like the dogs we are.

So I thought it appropriate to share something that relates at once to (allegedly) democratic self-governance, bloggy content, and stupidity. The back story is horrendously complicated, but to summarize, it started with a show trial of Comrade Clarke for his offenses against the We Are All Giant Nuclear Fireball Now Party (WAAGNFNP). In his defense, he presented the following video:

No comments:

 

Website and photos, unless otherwise indicated: Copyright 2006-7, by the authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

This website, and all contents, are licensed under the “creative commons attribution, non-commercial, share alike” license. This means, essentially, that you may copy and modify any of these materials for your own use, or for educational purposes. You can freely copy them and distribute them to others. The only rules are that you must attribute the work to the original authors, use them in a non-commercial way, and pass along these rights to everyone else.

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors, not anyone nor anything else. Word.